About this calculator

PFDavg or PFH for one 1oo1 channel

Use the low-demand modes to estimate PFDavg from failure rates and proof testing. Use the high-demand mode to estimate PFH with explicit demand interval (DI), diagnostic test interval (DTI) and partial diagnostic credit.

For high-demand screening, the PFH calculator also works as a diagnostic test interval calculator: change DI or DTI to see how partial diagnostic credit changes the residual λDD contribution and PFH SIL band.

  • Basic: PFDavg ≈ λDU × T / 2, where T is the proof-test interval.
  • Advanced: PFDavg ≈ λDU × [PTC × (T/2 + MRT) + (1 − PTC) × MT/2] + λDD × MTTR, adding proof-test coverage (PTC), mission time (MT), restoration time and detected failures.
  • High demand: no diagnostic credit below DI/DTI = 2; partial credit uses PDC ≈ (DI/DTI) × [1 − exp(−DTI/DI)] from 2× to below 100×; full credit applies at 100× or more. PFH = λDU + (1 − PDC) × λDD.

Worked example

100 FIT, tested every year

A transmitter with λDU = 100 FIT (100 × 10⁻⁹ per hour) is proof tested once a year (T = 8,760 h): PFDavg ≈ 100 × 10⁻⁹ × 8,760 / 2 = 4.38e-4, an RRF of about 2,283. That sits in the SIL 3 band for this one channel — the SIF as a whole still has to be verified.

For the PFH example, DI = 1 s, DTI = 100 ms, λDU = 500 FIT and λDD = 8,500 FIT give 95.16% partial diagnostic credit and PFH ≈ 9.11e−7 per hour, in the SIL 2 quantitative band. The method follows exida’s published nonredundant high-demand treatment.

When to go further

Use SIL verification for the whole SIF

A claim for a Safety Instrumented Function needs every subsystem — sensors, logic solver and final elements — with their voting and common cause, plus architectural constraints and systematic capability. SIL Verification does that and shows which gate limits the claimed SIL. For architecture alone, use the SFF / HFT calculator; for the background, read PFDavg: meaning, model and assumptions.

PFH diagnostic-credit basis: exida, Safety Instrumented Function Verification, equations 2 and 3.

IEC 61511-1 safety lifecycle
Management of functional safety and assessment · Cl. 5
  1. 5Installation, commissioning and validation (outside SILProof scope)Cl. 14–15
  2. 6Operation and maintenance (outside SILProof scope)Cl. 16
  3. 7Modification (outside SILProof scope)Cl. 17
  4. 8Decommissioning (outside SILProof scope)Cl. 18
Verification · Cl. 7

Questions

Frequently asked questions

What does PFDavg mean?

The average probability that a safety function fails to act when a demand occurs, in low-demand mode. Its inverse is the risk reduction factor (RRF), and its band gives the quantitative SIL: below 10⁻¹ SIL 1, below 10⁻² SIL 2, below 10⁻³ SIL 3 and below 10⁻⁴ SIL 4.

Why is it only a screening result?

It treats one device or channel in 1oo1. A real SIF has sensors, a logic solver and final elements, often redundant, with common cause, and its claimed SIL also depends on architectural constraints and systematic capability. SIL verification covers all of that.

What do the advanced inputs add?

Proof-test coverage below 100% leaves a share of dangerous undetected failures until the end of the mission time; restoration time adds the time a revealed failure takes to repair; λDD adds the time detected failures spend being repaired. Each makes the result more realistic and usually higher.

How does the PFH diagnostic test interval calculator use DI and DTI?

For a nonredundant high-demand function, the calculator uses no diagnostic credit below DI/DTI = 2, partial credit from 2× to below 100×, and full credit at 100× or more. It then calculates PFH as λDU plus the uncredited share of λDD. Credit is valid only when a detected fault initiates the safe state within the process safety time.

Which units does it use?

Failure rates use FIT (failures per 10⁹ hours). PFDavg uses years for proof-test and mission intervals. PFH demand and diagnostic intervals can use milliseconds, seconds, minutes, hours or days.