Skip to content
SILProof

Functional safety · IEC 61508 · IEC 61511

PFD, RRF and SIL calculator

Turn a PFDavg into a risk reduction factor and SIL band, or an RRF into a PFDavg, for low demand. High demand: PFH to SIL.

Examples
Demand mode
Advanced

Shows how far the value is from the target band’s limit.

SIL band (low demand)Quantitative band only

SIL 2

Risk reduction factor 500 · PFDavg 2 × 10⁻³

PFDavg
2 × 10⁻³
RRF
500
SIL 2 PFDavg band
10⁻³ to < 10⁻²
SIL 2 RRF band
> 100 to ≤ 1,000

Working

  1. RRF = 1 / PFDavg = 1 / 2 × 10⁻³ = 500
  2. Band: 10⁻³ ≤ PFDavg < 10⁻² (RRF 100 < RRF ≤ 1,000) → SIL 2

What the calculator is for

A LOPA or risk graph gives a required risk reduction factor; a SIL verification gives an achieved PFDavg. The two meet in the SIL tables of IEC 61508-1 and IEC 61511-1. This converter moves between them instantly and shows which band a number falls in, how much margin it has to a target, and the exact boundary values.

  • RRF = 1 / PFDavg in low-demand mode.
  • The bands are open at the lower edge: PFDavg = 10⁻² exactly (RRF 100) is SIL 1, not SIL 2. SILProof’s engine uses the same rule.
  • High demand or continuous mode uses PFH, the average frequency of dangerous failure per hour.

Worked example

A LOPA finds that the scenario needs a risk reduction factor of 250. The SIF therefore needs PFDavg below 1 / 250 = 4 × 10⁻³, which sits in the SIL 2 band (RRF above 100 and up to 1,000).

The design is verified at PFDavg = 1.6 × 10⁻³, an RRF of 625. It meets the requirement with a factor of 2.5 to spare, and it is in the SIL 2 band. Note the order: compare against the required RRF, not just the band. A SIL 2 PFDavg of 8 × 10⁻³ would not meet an RRF of 250.

SIL tables

Low demand mode (IEC 61511-1 Table 4)
SILPFDavgRRF
SIL 410⁻⁵ ≤ PFDavg < 10⁻⁴10,000 < RRF ≤ 100,000
SIL 310⁻⁴ ≤ PFDavg < 10⁻³1,000 < RRF ≤ 10,000
SIL 210⁻³ ≤ PFDavg < 10⁻²100 < RRF ≤ 1,000
SIL 110⁻² ≤ PFDavg < 10⁻¹10 < RRF ≤ 100
High demand or continuous mode (IEC 61511-1 Table 5)
SILPFH (per hour)
SIL 410⁻⁹ ≤ PFH < 10⁻⁸
SIL 310⁻⁸ ≤ PFH < 10⁻⁷
SIL 210⁻⁷ ≤ PFH < 10⁻⁶
SIL 110⁻⁶ ≤ PFH < 10⁻⁵

Common mistakes

  • Claiming SIL from PFDavg alone. The claimed SIL is the lowest of the quantitative band, the architectural constraints (HFT and SFF, see the SFF / HFT calculator) and systematic capability.
  • Using PFDavg in high demand. If the demand rate is more than once a year, IEC 61511 treats the function as high demand and PFH applies.
  • Rounding into a band. 1.0 × 10⁻² is SIL 1; 9.9 × 10⁻³ is SIL 2. Keep the unrounded value.
  • SIL 4 in the process sector. Values below 10⁻⁵ fall outside the table, and IEC 61511 discourages SIL 4 SIFs; revisit the risk analysis instead.

Basis

Bands follow IEC 61508-1:2010 Tables 2 and 3 and IEC 61511-1:2016 Tables 4 and 5. The calculator uses exactly the band rule of the SILProof engine, which is checked against IEC 61508-6 Annex B. It gives the quantitative band only.

SILProof

A SIL band is one gate of three.

SILProof keeps the risk basis, SRS and three-gate SIL verification of each safety instrumented function on one record.

Verify the whole SIF: PFDavg, architecture and systematic capability

Frequently asked questions

How do I convert PFD to RRF?

RRF = 1 / PFDavg. A PFDavg of 0.002 gives an RRF of 500. The conversion only applies to low-demand mode.

Is PFDavg = 0.01 SIL 1 or SIL 2?

SIL 1. The SIL 2 band is 10⁻³ ≤ PFDavg < 10⁻², so 10⁻² itself belongs to SIL 1. In RRF terms, SIL 2 needs an RRF above 100.

What PFH is needed for SIL 2?

A PFH of at least 10⁻⁷ and below 10⁻⁶ dangerous failures per hour is the SIL 2 band in high demand or continuous mode.

Does a PFDavg in the SIL 2 band make the function SIL 2?

No. It is one of three gates. Architectural constraints and systematic capability must also support SIL 2, and the lowest of the three is the claimed SIL.